Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
492-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

492-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023300 50.883042)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023214 50.883033,-1.023218 50.883050,-1.023230 50.883065,-1.023249 50.883077,-1.023272 50.883085,-1.023299 50.883087,-1.023325 50.883085,-1.023349 50.883078,-1.023368 50.883066,-1.023380 50.883051,-1.023385 50.883034,-1.023381 50.883018,-1.023369 50.883002,-1.023351 50.882990,-1.023327 50.882982,-1.023301 50.882980,-1.023274 50.882982,-1.023251 50.882989,-1.023231 50.883001,-1.023219 50.883016,-1.023214 50.883033)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL